Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 7, 2025. It is now read-only.

Spec skeleton for interacting with the fenced frame config mapping#616

Merged
miketaylr merged 24 commits into
WICG:mainfrom
gtanzer:construct-config
Jun 28, 2023
Merged

Spec skeleton for interacting with the fenced frame config mapping#616
miketaylr merged 24 commits into
WICG:mainfrom
gtanzer:construct-config

Conversation

@gtanzer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gtanzer gtanzer commented Jun 8, 2023

@gtanzer gtanzer changed the title Spec pending config construction WIP: Spec pending config construction Jun 8, 2023
@JensenPaul JensenPaul added the spec Relates to the spec label Jun 9, 2023
@gtanzer gtanzer changed the title WIP: Spec pending config construction Spec skeleton for interacting with the fenced frame config mapping Jun 9, 2023
@gtanzer gtanzer force-pushed the construct-config branch from 05d82f9 to 524a1f0 Compare June 14, 2023 18:04
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
@gtanzer gtanzer force-pushed the construct-config branch from 2129554 to 2019c08 Compare June 16, 2023 16:45
@domfarolino domfarolino self-requested a review June 20, 2023 15:44
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@domfarolino domfarolino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are a number of TODOs here which are hard to evaluate. It would be good to know how many of them are going to be resolved in this PR vs after.

Separately: will there be a follow-up to #593 (review) where we actually resolve the promise with a web-exposed FencedFrameConfig object that internally references the config struct?

Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@domfarolino domfarolino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK it sounds like there is some pending work in this PR so let me know when I should take another look next!

Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs
@domfarolino
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

I'll try closing and re-opening this to kick off the PR preview thing again, see if it is "fixed" now.

@domfarolino domfarolino reopened this Jun 28, 2023
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@domfarolino domfarolino left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty much lgtm with a few pretty small things!

Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs Outdated
Comment thread spec.bs
Comment thread spec.bs
@miketaylr miketaylr merged commit e332640 into WICG:main Jun 28, 2023
github-actions Bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2023
)

SHA: e332640
Reason: push, by miketaylr

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

spec Relates to the spec

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants