ast: Improve behavior for user-defined classes #117486
Description
From @encukou:
Thanks for the fix. Since it's a blocker I merged it, even though I'd have one more review comment:
It would be good to add this to the new test, and improve the behaviour (the error is quite opaque):
class MoreFieldsThanTypes(ast.AST):
_fields = ('a', 'b')
_field_types = {'a': int | None}
a: int | None = None
b: int | None = NoneOriginally posted by @encukou in #117266 (comment)
Based on robotframework/robotframework#5091 (comment), we should also document _field_types.
Linked PRs
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels