Skip to content

Updated libs status show datetime utc#7082

Merged
youknowone merged 1 commit intoRustPython:mainfrom
ShaharNaveh:update-libs-utc
Feb 11, 2026
Merged

Updated libs status show datetime utc#7082
youknowone merged 1 commit intoRustPython:mainfrom
ShaharNaveh:update-libs-utc

Conversation

@ShaharNaveh
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh commented Feb 11, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automated status updates to display date and time in UTC timezone with explicit timezone label for clarity.

@ShaharNaveh ShaharNaveh added the skip:ci Skip running the ci label Feb 11, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request modifies a GitHub Actions workflow to switch from local time to UTC time when generating timestamps. The date command is updated to use the -u flag, and the output label is appended with " (UTC)" to clarify the timezone.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Timezone Standardization
.github/workflows/update-libs-status.yaml
Changed date command from local to UTC using date -u flag and appended " (UTC)" label to body output for timezone clarity.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Auto update lib status #7074: Modifies the same GitHub Actions workflow file and the current PR's UTC timestamp changes are directly related to that PR's date and body-generation steps.

Suggested reviewers

  • youknowone

Poem

🐰 Time marches on in UTC so fine,
No more local zones will blur the line!
With date -u we race east, precise and bright,
The workflow speaks truth in coordinated light! ⏰

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: updating the libs status workflow to display datetime in UTC instead of local time.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@youknowone youknowone merged commit a41d4c5 into RustPython:main Feb 11, 2026
11 of 13 checks passed
youknowone pushed a commit to youknowone/RustPython that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

skip:ci Skip running the ci

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants