Skip to content

chore: Add 'freeze' to list of imperatives#411

Merged
shenxianpeng merged 1 commit into
commit-check:mainfrom
alfonsomunozpomer:chore/add-freeze-to-imperatives
May 14, 2026
Merged

chore: Add 'freeze' to list of imperatives#411
shenxianpeng merged 1 commit into
commit-check:mainfrom
alfonsomunozpomer:chore/add-freeze-to-imperatives

Conversation

@alfonsomunozpomer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@alfonsomunozpomer alfonsomunozpomer commented May 14, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added support for "freeze" as a valid commit message type.

Review Change Stack

@alfonsomunozpomer alfonsomunozpomer requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2026 16:44
@alfonsomunozpomer alfonsomunozpomer requested review from shenxianpeng and removed request for a team May 14, 2026 16:44
@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify Bot commented May 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for commit-check ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6333668
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/commit-check/deploys/6a05fc0830f1ec000756adde
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-411--commit-check.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 14, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 341d5b11-5970-4299-a550-cb691c9ae131

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d61ba48 and 6333668.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • commit_check/imperatives.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR adds the imperative verb "freeze" to the IMPERATIVES set in commit_check/imperatives.py, enabling commit message validation to recognize freeze as a valid imperative command.

Changes

Imperative Verb Addition

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add freeze imperative verb
commit_check/imperatives.py
The IMPERATIVES set is updated to include "freeze" as an additional recognized imperative verb for commit message validation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A frozen moment in time,
A new word joins the climb,
"freeze" now enforces the line,
Commit messages, so divine! ❄️

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding 'freeze' to the IMPERATIVES set in commit_check/imperatives.py.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks!

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 14, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.51%. Comparing base (d61ba48) to head (6333668).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #411      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.71%   95.51%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines        1004     1004              
==========================================
- Hits          961      959       -2     
- Misses         43       45       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 505c9eb into commit-check:main May 14, 2026
31 of 32 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label May 14, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq Bot commented May 14, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

🎉 Hooray! pytest-codspeed just leveled up to 5.0.1!

A heads-up, this is a breaking change and it might affect your current performance baseline a bit. But here's the exciting part - it's packed with new, cool features and promises improved result stability 🥳!
Curious about what's new? Visit our releases page to delve into all the awesome details about this new version.

✅ 245 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 108 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing alfonsomunozpomer:chore/add-freeze-to-imperatives (6333668) with main (27f85e4)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 108 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

  2. No successful run was found on main (d61ba48) during the generation of this report, so 27f85e4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants