-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.3k
GH-105229: Replace some superinstructions with single instruction equivalent. #105230
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 4 commits
0087a08
178dbb4
7c7b5b5
1f5022b
af4d561
c54a6b8
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||||||||||
| Replace some dynamic superinstructions will single instruction equivalents. | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||
| Replace some dynamic superinstructions will single instruction equivalents. | |
| Replace some dynamic superinstructions with single instruction equivalents. |
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| Replace some dynamic superinstructions will single instruction equivalents. | |
| Replace some dynamic superinstructions with single instruction equivalents. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heh. Crossed posts.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just curious, how are the stats on this? Is it worth keeping?
I would expect most of these pairs to span multiple lines. Although maybe comprehensions and generator expressions make up for it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know, as you say it might be quite low.
I think we should keep it for this PR anyway, as we are replacing two-codeunit superinstructions with the one-codeunit equivalent. We can change the choice of superinstructions in another PR.