gh-91279: Note SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()#139396
gh-91279: Note SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()#139396vstinner merged 10 commits intopython:mainfrom
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()#139396Conversation
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Ok, I'm proposing to remove that note from the 'A new type of interpreter' section, and I've also made the A |
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()
Finished, thank you! |
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support in ZipFile.writestr()
Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
vstinner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, but English is not my first language, so I'm not sure about the sentence :-)
|
ping @vstinner @AA-Turner |
I think the text can be improved here. The sentence lacks an object, but more importantly we don't say what has actually changed in the method's behaviour if SDE is set.
The sentence was completed.
|
thanks! |
|
"All required checks pass" CI failed with a cryptic error message: So I updated the branch to attempt to fix the CI issue. |
|
Thanks @Wulian233 for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.14. |
…()` doc (pythonGH-139396) (cherry picked from commit 5ad738f8fb214e9852dc527e6754cbfb7abf6cc8) Co-authored-by: Wulian233 <1055917385@qq.com> Co-authored-by: Victor Stinner <vstinner@python.org>
|
GH-146222 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.14 branch. |
|
Merged, thanks for fixing the doc. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.